A geometrical method for consensus building in GDM with incomplete heterogeneous preference information
نویسندگان
چکیده
In real-life group decision-making (GDM) problems, the preferences given by decision-makers(DMs) are often incomplete, because complexity of problems and limitation knowledge DM make it difficult for DMs to take a determined evaluation alternatives. addition, preference relations provided heterogeneous they always have different decision habits hobbies. However, consensus method GDM under incomplete is rarely studied. For four common relations: utility values, orderings, (incomplete) multiplicative fuzzy relations, this paper proposes geometrical building in GDM. Specifically, we integrate structures using similarity-based optimization model set corresponding measurement. Then, modification weighting processes proposed improve degree. Finally, conduct comparison analysis based on qualitative algorithm existing reaching methods. Numerical analyses convergence tests show that our can promote improvement degree GDM, has less time than previous The more explainable due operability simplicity. • Propose with relations. Integrate model. A various measurements representative
منابع مشابه
Preference aggregation with incomplete information
We show that in an environment of incomplete information, if individual preferences are sufficiently rich, then monotonicity and the Pareto property applied only when there is common knowledge of Pareto dominance imply (i) there must exist a common prior over the smallest common knowledge event and (ii) aggregation must be ex-ante utilitarian with respect to that common prior. This work builds ...
متن کاملNew Consensus Criteria for GDM
For at least a generation there has been a divergence of opinions about gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). On one hand were those who, on the basis of largely observational studies in humans and extrapolation of animal data, felt that women should be tested for GDM and have their diagnosed GDM treated. On the other hand, there were the “obskeptics” who felt that no significant action should b...
متن کاملArgumentation-Based Preference Modelling with Incomplete Information
No intelligent decision support system functions even remotely without knowing the preferences of the user. A major problem is that the way average users think about and formulate their preferences does not match the utility-based quantitative frameworks currently used in decision support systems. For the average user qualitative models are a better fit. This paper presents an argumentationbase...
متن کاملA Consensus Model for Group Decision Making with Incomplete Unbalanced Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations
We present a consensus model for group decision making with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic preference relations, i.e., assuming that the preferences are assessed on linguistic term sets whose terms are not symmetrically and uniformly distributed. This consensus model can manage incomplete information situations, that is, situations where the experts do not give all the preference values that they ...
متن کاملA Value Supplementation Method for Case Bases with Incomplete Information
In this paper we present a method for supplementing incomplete cases with information from other cases within a case base. The acquisition of complete and correct cases is a time-consuming task, but nevertheless crucial for the quality and acceptance of a case-based reasoning system. The method introduced in this paper uses association rules to identify relations between attributes and, based o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Applied Soft Computing
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1568-4946', '1872-9681']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107224